NEWARK — A state appeals court on Wednesday declined to toss the conviction of a former South Amboy woman convicted of killing her young son in 1991, ruling that prosecutors presented sufficient evidence to prove her guilt and the trial judge didn't err by dismissing a juror during deliberations.

An attorney representing Michelle Lodzinski said Wednesday she was disappointed by the ruling and plans to appeal to the state Supreme Court.

Lodzinksi, 51, was found guilty by a jury on May 18, 2016, following a 4-month trial in New Brunswick.

She was convicted of killing her 5-year old son, Timothy Wiltsey, who was reported missing from a carnival in Sayreville over Memorial Day weekend in 1991.

The child’s partial remains were recovered on April 23, 1992 from a remote section of an industrial park in Edison, according to the Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office.

The body's decomposition made it impossible to determine a cause of death, but prosecutors presented an expert who said the child's death could be considered a homicide.

Lodzinksi was a suspect early in the case due to her changing accounts of what happened on the day the boy disappeared, as she told investigators varying accounts, describing strangers who could have kidnapped him.

She wasn't charged until 2014, after investigators developed new evidence and she was arrested near Port St. Lucie, Florida, where she had been living.

The case went cold for two decades, until investigators found three babysitters who identified a blue blanket found near the boy's body as having come from Lodzinski's home.

The blanket contained no trace evidence or DNA tying it to either Wiltsey or Lodzinski, and no other evidence presented by prosecutors tied her directly to his death, her attorney, Gerald Krovatin, argued.

The circumstantial evidence didn't prove that Lodzinski caused his death or did it knowingly, he said.
Prosecutors argued before the appeals court that the balance of the evidence pointed to only one conclusion, even though there was no smoking gun.

Although the appeals court wrote Wednesday that the arguments raised "a close question," it concluded that the circumstantial evidence combined with Lodzinski's behavior after the boy's disappearance was enough to prove her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The other main point of contention concerned state Superior Court Judge Dennis Nieves' dismissal of the jury foreman during deliberations, after it was revealed the juror had done internet research on FBI crime-scene guidelines and shared his findings with other jurors.

An alternate stepped in and the panel reached a guilty verdict several hours later.

The juror's actions didn't merit a dismissal, defense attorneys argued. But if they did, they contended, that meant the whole jury was tainted and Nieves should have declared a mistrial.

The appeals court disagreed, writing Wednesday that "the judge here found, and the record supports his conclusion, that the foreperson's research produced no taint."

In an email, Krovatin said Lodzinski's conviction "was always about emotion, not evidence."

"The State consistently failed to present any evidence that Michelle Lodzinski caused the tragic death of Timmy Wiltsey," he added. "We respectfully disagree with the Court's analysis of the sufficiency of the evidence and the prejudicial handling of jury deliberations."

(Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

More from New Jersey 101.5:

Sign up for the NJ1015.com Newsletter

Get the best of NJ1015.com delivered to your inbox every day.