“Bridge-gate” isn’t going away anytime too soon – which seems fine for Democrats locally and nationally.

Keeping the Governor on the ropes these days seems to be a cottage industry – despite the Governor’s recent denial of having any knowledge as to why the Ft. Lee approaches to the George Washington Bridge were being closed other than for a traffic study.

And now adding more ballast to the pile is the revelation by Assembly Transportation Committee Chairman John Wisniewski that if it’s found the bridge closure was used for political purposes, the Governor could be facing impeachment.

As I’ve stated before, I take the Governor at his word – his very public “mea culpa” for not knowing what senior members of his staff were doing behind his back.

And yet, while there are still questions that gnaw at us as to how the Governor was clueless as to what was transpiring, do you feel all you’re getting right now is political posturing from an assemblyman who momentarily considered a run for governor this past time around; and who might be considering a run in 2017? (Just a hunch on my part!)

The chairman of a New Jersey legislative panel investigating the George Washington Bridge lane closures said Gov. Chris Christie's top aides had engaged in a "cover-up" and the governor could be impeached if it is determined he was aware of efforts to use the bridge for political purposes.

"Using the George Washington Bridge, a public resource, to exact a political vendetta, is a crime," New Jersey Assemblyman John Wisniewski, who is spearheading the bridge probe, told NBC News on Saturday. "Having people use their official position to have a political game is a crime. So if those tie back to the governor in any way, it clearly becomes an impeachable offense."

Wisniewski said he does not find the governor's denials credible given the number of his top aides and appointees shown to have knowledge of the matter in thousands of pages of emails and text messages his committee has obtained.

"It's hard to really accept the governor's statement that he knew nothing until the other morning," Wisnieswki said.

Referring to Christie aides named in the emails and text messages, he added: "These people travel with him, these people discuss things with him every single day. This is not an isolated, unknown story. ... He knew there was an investigation. He knew people were looking at it, and his senior staff was involved (and) he expects us to believe he knew nothing? I just find that implausible."

Wisniewski’s comments came shortly after New Jersey’s Democratic Assembly Speaker -elect Vincent Prieto said he plans to call a special session on Thursday to reauthorize subpoena power for Wisniewski's committee. That would enable Wisniewski to pursue what Prieto called "the abuse of power" in the bridge lane closures.

Wisniewski said he plans to use that power to subpoena official and private emails, text mesages and other documents from Christie's current and former top aides and then call them in "one by one" to testify.

One of the aides who Wisniewski and other Democrats said merit special scrutiny is Regina Egea, a senior staffer who Christie has designated to be his next chief of staff. Documents released Friday show that Egea was forwarded a copy of a scathing email from Patrick Foye, the Port Authority's executive director, at 10:44 a.m. on Sept. 13, 2012– four days after the first lane closures and a few hours after Foye sent it. In the email, Foye called the lane closures "abusive," a threat to public safety, and a violation of "federal law and the laws of both states" (New York and New Jersey.)

Bill Baroni, a Christie appointee who was then deputy director of the Port Authority, forwarded the email from Foye, marked "Importance: High," to Egea three hours after Foye sent it to top Port Authority officials.

There is no indication from the documents whether Egea responded to the email. But Wisniewski said, "It's hard to believe that she got that email and she just filed it away or she said nothing."

"If you know anything about New Jersey statehouse politics, this is a governor -- all of our governors quite frankly -- are governors who really tightly manage that operation," he said. "There are no freelancers or independent operations there. And so it strains credibility to believe that the governor knew nothing."

I still wonder myself what the genesis of the statement “time for some traffic problems in Ft. Lee” came from; but regardless, once the “I” word is used, Wisniewski is beginning to sound a bit like Kenneth Starr, the independent prosecutor who led the investigation into President Bill Clinton’s affair with White House staffer Monica Lewinsky.

And while Clinton was impeached in December of ’98, the Senate failed to convict him of perjury 2 months later.

But in the end, it closed another sad chapter in our history and came off as being another political witch hunt - of which this is taking on the appearance.